Slaaamdunch
Copying licensed material requires proper attribution
editHi. I see in a recent addition to Greenwich Judgement you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Parliament Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Slaaamdunch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Faith School
editWell done for moving it to Faith School (United Kingdom). Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Slaaamdunch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editApril 2021
editYour edit to UK Beach Tour (UKBT) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry this was flagged as a copyright breach - it wasn't my intention. I was quoting information that is fundamental to the topic. I have now re-added the text but hopefully made it much clearer which parts are quoted. If this can be further improved, please let me know.Slaaamdunch (talk) 11:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- The text I re-added as a block quote has now been removed too. It is a list the published aims of the organisation I am writing about, so it would not be appropriate to re-word them. They define what the organisation stands for, so I would like to include them if possible. However, I will follow the administrator's instructions and not re-add them. Can the copyright notice be removed now? Slaaamdunch (talk) 07:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- I have now removed the copyright tag because the page was reviewed by an administrator (The Earwig) Slaaamdunch (talk) 09:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)