Hi, in the article Electric Motor Education and Research Foundation‎ you created, there is a lot of detailed information that lacks in-line citations, which makes it more difficult to check for factual inaccuracies. Can you confirm are the contents of the article accurate in your view? You seem to know a lot about EMERF and SMMA, so I was wondering do you work there? And can you add some in-line citations? Perhaps you could reply here to keep the thread of conversation in one place. Thanks, - Neparis (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

____
Hello Neparis,
Thanks you for your note and questions. I do apologize for taking this long to respond; I just recently found this page and did not realize I had a message from you. I suppose I'm still getting used to the full extent of Wikipedia.
Regarding your questions. I am a member of the Board of Directors of the Electric Motor Education and Research Foundation. All of the information in the article is accurate. What are the sort of in-line citations you feel will help this article? An example or two will get me started in the right direction.
Thanks,
Sjsprague (talk) 00:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
____
 

The article Electric Motor Education and Research Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this meets WP:NORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply