Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Orbitalcraft I. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. --Rlandmann 04:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Sirhan. If this is not a hoax, please provide some evidence of the press release. As the original contributor, the onus is on you to back up the claims in this article. --Rlandmann 05:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Orbitalcraft I. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - BillCJ 05:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:BillCJ, you will be blocked from editing. - BillCJ 21:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- In fact, you now have been blocked from editing. Removing admin tags from the Orbitalcraft I articles is nothing short of vandalism; and personal attacks and profanity such as what you made on BillCJ's page cannot be tolerated on Wikipedia. This is a first block only, and will expire in 24 hours. If you continue to vandalise the project, subsequent blocks will be longer. --Rlandmann 22:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Sirhan Kennedy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I realize my mistakes. I would like to request an early unblockage. This way, I can cite my sources (on Oribitalcraft I), per your request. Not allowing me to do this would be ridiculous.
Decline reason:
Your creation of an obvious hoax article, attempting to disrupt process by removing process-related tags from said article, and subsequent violation of WP:NPA here are what should be classified as ridiculous. Request denied. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia seriously, wait out the block and consider the consequences of your actions, then come back and do so. --Kinu t/c 04:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sirhan Kennedy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It is not a hoax. Give me a chance to prove it, you fucking idiot.
Decline reason:
There goes any chance of being unblocked anytime soon. — -- John Reaves (talk) 05:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Since you don't appear to be serious about the project after all, I've extended your block indefinitely. I've also protected this talk page to prevent further abuse of the unblock template and continued violations of WP:NPA. Goodbye. --Kinu t/c 05:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)