Your submission at Articles for creation: Commercial Valuers and Surveyors (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commercial Valuers and Surveyors (November 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of CVS Business Rates

edit

Hello Sirdreamer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CVS Business Rates for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 11:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest

edit

  Hello Sirdreamer. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sirdreamer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sirdreamer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Citobun (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC) Hi Citobun, you are mistaken. As you can see from my conversation with Xanthomelanoussprog: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xanthomelanoussprog. Thanks Sirdreamer (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply