SirAlmond

August 2017

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Reichskommissariat Don-Wolga because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nikolay Matveyev, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 15:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Reichskommissariat Ural

The article Reichskommissariat Ural has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. No text. Not enough information for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please make sure that your edit summaries accurately reflect what you are doing. For example, don't give the edit summaries "Typo" and "Fixed typo" for edits which could not possibly be construed as corrections of typos. Also, edit summaries as vague as "Something" are not likely to be helpful to anyone. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arno Schickedanz

The article Arno Schickedanz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. No text. Not clear what it is about.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please don't create articles until you have some useful content to put in them. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 15:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Further problems with your editing

I see that you have ignored my message above about unsuitable edit summaries. This may in itself not seem to you to be important, but it adds to various other problems with your editing, and if you continue to be seen as a persistently disruptive and uncooperative editor then you may well be blocked from editing by an administrator before long. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Further observation of your editing since posting my last message above has made it clear that your editing is vandalism. It also appears almost certain that you are evading blocks on other accounts. This account has therefore been indefinitely blocked from editing. All pages created by this account will be deleted if they haven't already, and all outstanding edits made with it will be reverted. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)