Sim fontes
Unblocking request
editSim fontes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
why was I blocked?
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @PhilKnight didn’t was you who block me? Why did you do that? Sim fontes (talk) 08:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Explain this edit. PhilKnight (talk) 08:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was test edit to see if it worked. I now realise it was bad idea Sim fontes (talk) 08:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight Sim fontes (talk) 08:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- You seem to have made quite a few test edits. PhilKnight (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes sorry @PhilKnight Sim fontes (talk) 08:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's best you stay blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 08:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- but I want to switch to finding sources and making good edits! @PhilKnight Sim fontes (talk) 08:45, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not going to unblock you, but your unblock request is open, so an uninvolved admin will review the block. PhilKnight (talk) 08:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I insist @PhilKnight Sim fontes (talk) 08:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not going to comment any further. PhilKnight (talk) 08:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please @PhilKnight I insist Sim fontes (talk) 09:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not going to comment any further. PhilKnight (talk) 08:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I insist @PhilKnight Sim fontes (talk) 08:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not going to unblock you, but your unblock request is open, so an uninvolved admin will review the block. PhilKnight (talk) 08:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- but I want to switch to finding sources and making good edits! @PhilKnight Sim fontes (talk) 08:45, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's best you stay blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 08:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes sorry @PhilKnight Sim fontes (talk) 08:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- You seem to have made quite a few test edits. PhilKnight (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight Sim fontes (talk) 08:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was test edit to see if it worked. I now realise it was bad idea Sim fontes (talk) 08:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Explain this edit. PhilKnight (talk) 08:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 12:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)