Stephanie Nolasco

edit

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Stephanie Nolasco, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Stephanie Nolasco. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. •Elomis• 02:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

Image tagging for Image:Aww 022.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Aww 022.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


Your changes to Stephanie Nolasco

edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Stephanie Nolasco, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Nolasco. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --MetsBot 02:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Kathryn NicDhàna 04:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

AfD for 'Stephanie Nolasco' article

edit

I would advise you as creator of the article to make a comment as part of the AfD proceedings at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Nolasco. The proceedings are part of the permanent record of Wikipedia. Regards, --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Nolasco

edit

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Nolasco (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Third removal of AfD notice or content from AfD discussion (diff)

edit

As the IP edits continued your comments and pattern of actions, I believe the edits done under IPs 216.49.220.131 and 216.49.220.163 were your actions. Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kathryn NicDhàna 22:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Third page-blanking under this account (diff)

edit
 

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Nolasco, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kathryn NicDhàna 22:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Personal Attacks

edit

Your comments here are inappropriate. Personal attacks are a violation of Wikipedia policy and not conducive to the Encyclopedia. --Kathryn NicDhàna 23:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Nolasco

edit
 

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 23:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 23:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply