Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tailed beasts, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Changing accounts won't help. You're still vandalizing. It's been explained to you why you're wrong. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 08:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 08:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Proof

edit

It's harmful when you act ignorant and replace established facts with incorrect ones. Knock it off. Also, for what has got to be the third or fourth time, look at the damn image. It is quite obviously not a shark. Finally, the three-tailed beast is in no way related to the legends you keep trying to shove into the article. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 08:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hasn't it sunk in yet? The... three... tailed... beast... is... not... a... shark. It is not "possibly a shark", nor it is related. I'll also point out that there's no such thing as a "three-tailed shark". Some fan made that up. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 08:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Again, no it's not. That whole nonsense comes from Legend of the Tailed Beasts - Advanced Bijū Directory, which is complete bunk. The proper legend is detailed at Isonade, and a quick confirmation can be found here. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 09:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply