Welcome to Wikipedia from the Wikiproject Medicine! edit

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of content about health here on Wikipedia, pursuing the mission of Wikipedia to provide the public with articles that present accepted knowledge, created and maintained by a community of editors.

One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board!

First, some basics about editing Wikipedia, which is a strange place behind the scenes; you may find some of the ways we operate to be surprising. Please take your time and understand how this place works. Here are some useful links, which have information to help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

  • Everything starts with the mission - the mission of Wikipedia is to provide the public with articles that summarize accepted knowledge, working in a community of editors. (see WP:NOT)
  • We find "accepted knowledge" for biomedical information in sources defined by WP:MEDRS -- we generally use literature reviews published in good journals or statements by major medical or scientific bodies and we generally avoid using research papers, editorials, and popular media as sources for such content. We read MEDRS sources and summarize them, giving the most space and emphasis (what we call WP:WEIGHT) to the most prevalent views found in MEDRS sources.
  • Please see WPMED's "how to" guide for editing content about health
  • More generally please see The five pillars of Wikipedia and please be aware of the "policies and guidelines" that govern what we do here; these have been generated by the community itself over the last fifteen years, and you will need to learn them (which is not too hard, it just takes some time). Documents about Wikipedia - the "back office" - reside in "Wikipedia space" where document titles are preceded by "Wikipedia:" (often abbreviated "WP:"). WP space is separate from "article space" (also called "mainspace") - the document at WP:CONSENSUS is different from, and serves as a different purpose than, the document at Consensus.

Every article and page in Wikipedia has an associated talk page, and these pages are essential because we editors use them to collaborate and work out disagreements. (This is your Talk page, associated with your user page.) When you use a Talk page, you should sign your name by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment; the Wikipedia software will automatically convert that into links to your Userpage and this page and will add a datestamp. This is how we know who said what. We also "thread" comments in a way that you will learn with time. Please see the Talk Page Guidelines to learn how to use talk pages.

  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. You can also just add our talk page to your watchlist and join in discussions that interest you. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, edit, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss it on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note below if you have any questions or problems. I wish you all the best here in Wikipedia! --Jytdog (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

WP:SELFCITE, WP:REFSPAM edit

Your contributions to date seem to be all about adding references to papers by Sheraz Khan.

While we love experts here (see WP:EXPERT) we do not love experts who use their editing privileges to promote their own work, which is a violation of the policy against abusing WP for promotion. This is also considered a form of spam -- see WP:REFSPAM. Please also see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI.

We do love experts, and it would wonderful if you would consider contributing more broadly. But please, enough of the refspamming. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 18:10, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Magnetoencephalography edit

Please stop adding primary sources to Magnetoencephalography. You are adding sources where good secondary sources are already provided. Medical claims must be supported by secondary sources - please read WP:MEDRS before you edit the article again. Please do not revert my removal of your sources again - you should use the article's Talk page to discuss disagreements. CatPath (talk) 01:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

On behalf of. edit

Would you please explain what you meant in this edit note where you wrote These edits were done on behalf of Dr. David Cohen? Please reply here, just below this. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 02:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dr. Cohen is the inventor of MEG, we are fortunate, he still with us and spreading wisdom, he provided the seminal MEG recording images, which I put on the wikipedia. It seems you guys don't need them, I will put them on the personal website server.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.167.230.81 (talk) 19:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

It is nice that he posted those on his website. That might be useful as an external link. You are not getting the idea of how WP works, however. Please try to learn. Jytdog (talk) 22:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply