Sergey Tsvigun
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
edit
|
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PL-21, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit
Hello, Sergey Tsvigun. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
"Pantsir" edit war.
editI see you had undone my reversion and then re-added the content, which is unexpected, but appreciated. On the whole, this edit war was very unnecessary, because the only thing you had to do there was to calm down and check the guidelines on referencing, which, while prohibiting usage of direct social media links in a "ref" tag, definitely do not prohibit sources based on social media posts. Also, you wrongly come to the conclusion there was some ideological component to these reversions: if you revise my previous edits in the "Pantsir" article, you'd find out I am not on any side there other than the side of Wikipedia. It's just that properly sourced content can not be removed from an article out of boredom or dislike for something, and I hope you understand that. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 20:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Nicholas Velasquez: Considering cited sources, finally I concluded that authors of the articles seemed to be specialists in their fields and they in general reasonably described their opinions. However, drafting style in the articles not neutral, their writers evidently support one side in the war - Russian-Syrian government one. The same could be said according sites where they are published. Furthermore, a paragraph describing the Pantsir combat use in Syria is dominated by Russian point of view. So, it gave the impression that somebody intentionally inserted and advocated one-side account and assessment of developments. And when you relatively quickly undid my edit and after reviving your recent edits I concluded that you probably were Eastern Slavic despite the Spanish-style nickname, my suspicion only strengthened. As a result, these factors created mutual misunderstandings and mistrust which, in their turn, contributed to war of edits and wasting time to eventually unnecessary multiple revisions of edits and controversies in edits description. -- Sergey Tsvigun (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- I understand what you're talking about, but it should be noted that keeping track of contributors' allegiances is way beyond our responsibilities as editors: Wikipedia already deals with propaganda through depreciation or blacklisting of certain sources and our job here is just to make sure everything added to an article is properly sourced and, if it's needed, make a case for limiting/prohibiting an ideologically colored source usage on this page. The rest is administrators' job. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |