Seg
Little context in Private Savings
edit
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Private Savings, by Andyjsmith (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Private Savings is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Private Savings, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Private Savings itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Seg, thanks for your message. I believe your question would be best directed to User:Ronz, who is actually the one responsible for tagging the article for notability concerns. At a glance however, I see that the article appears only to have two references, and both of those look to be publications written by (or for) the author/developer of the subject. You may want to read WP:PRIMARY, and do your best to add a few reliable, independently published references. Hope this helps. -- WikHead (talk) 13:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Additional comment - This message was in reply to a message posted to my talk page by 213.144.210.105, but signed with your user-name signature. -- WikHead (talk) 14:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)