Please understand that without an appeal a batsman can't be 'timed out' and no 'controversy erupted' as you claim. The only source you claim is not the most neutral or reliable one. I haven't seen it written anywhere on Cricinfo, which is the best source for such matters, that Ishant Sharma stirred up a controversy at all. In fact, Fairfax newspapers in Australia have written that he was a great example of a good man on the cricket field, especially when he shook hands with Andrew Symonds despite claiming him on 30. That was seen as a great gesture. Darrowen (talk) 05:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Hi See Other Side, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. --Mattinbgn\talk 05:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Three revert rule

edit

Hi, See Other Side. Be aware that Wikipedia has a three revert rule and editors breaching this can be blocked from editing. Discuss your edits on the talk page and if you can't find consensus, seek an outside opinion. Be bold, but stay cool!. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 05:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply