A tag has been placed on Rebecca Hales, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Lelkesa 09:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Virginia Tech Murders

edit

Hi, there is already a very substantial article on the topic, at Virginia Tech massacre, and it has been linked to from the main page since the event. I have made the page you penned into a redirect to the other article. J Milburn 19:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


I contacted the observatory of Mackay and many others and they confirmed me that was no snow, but snow grains (which is classified as different hidrometeor from the normal snow crystal and which is easily seen by the temperatures in the Observatory slightly above 10C during the "snow" event). You can write what you want, for me It doesn t change anything,if you want to fool people with lies and false data I don t care anything, I get no salary from Wikipedia,it is very clear to me your absolute incompetence in meteorology.(I am referring only in the professional way, nothing against you like people, of course). I have written more than 20 books about that and I am well considered the most competent people in the world about that issue , since I have the meteorological data of all the stations in the world since the first meteo observation in 1654 in England up today for all days and hourly basis (synops/metars), so I know exacly what weather has been in every single square meter of the planet of the past 400 years,so nobody in the world and even less yourself has absolutely nothing to teach me about. You, Get your things right.

Notability of Arthur H Clark

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Arthur H Clark, by Zetawoof, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Arthur H Clark seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Arthur H Clark, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Arthur H Clark itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arthur H Clark

edit

G'day Scott,

I notice you've made a number of edits to the Arthur H Clark article that might be described as ... iffy. Mr Clark seems like an interesting and notable chap, but it's not Wikipedia's job to promote him. We don't tend to promote people of any kind, as a matter of principle — see Write from a neutral point of view. Our articles should never be promotional puff pieces.

You began the article on Mr Clark with a copyright violation, and have since modified the "clean" version to insert further copyright violations and promotional language. This is not helpful to the project. Please keep in mind the policies and principles of the project when editing Wikipedia. Cheers, fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 14:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kepnock State High School

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kepnock State High School, by GarrieIrons, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kepnock State High School fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

no assertion of notability for a regional high school in Queensland, Australia.


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kepnock State High School, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Kepnock State High School itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Caroline Stuttle

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Caroline Stuttle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Caroline Stuttle. Skomorokh incite 22:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply