Scientist xkcd fan

Warning

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --ElKevbo (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

????? I am adding content... this is the free encyclopedia that anybody can edit, and nerd culture is important to it. it's important if xkcd mentions something...

let me guess... if i write x^2 = y^2 + q^2 that would mean nothing to you... lame... don't complain about what you don't understand.

What you are doing is vandalism, I am an experienced wikipedian and can state my case for adding content clearly and proprietary. Scientist xkcd fan (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Barrel. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 20:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Poisson distribution. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - DVdm (talk) 20:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Intelligence, you will be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 20:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (?) (talk) 20:57, 24 February 2010 (UTC)