RFA edit

I would recommend you to withdraw your request for adminship. Many users here hold high standards and only a select few become administrators. Right now, there are 1,742 administrators out of 12,852,844 users. You may also like to see a recently failed request fount here. But if you wish to continue,you have some questions at your RFA, and you should try to answer them. Regards, wiooiw (talk) 11:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have closed your RFA per WP:NOTNOW. I encourage you to take a look at the comments there and use them as you proceed in Wikipedia. It generally takes more experience than you currently have to become an admin. Perhaps take a look at WP:ADMIN. If you have any questions, feel free to ask; I'm always willing to help. 67.136.117.132 (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ok I just wish I had the chance to finish some of the questions asked... I kept it open because I wanted to better understand the community view on my request. Hopefully I will receive support and a little guidance doesn't hurt as I continue on Wikipedia and apply at a later time.--Saverx (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Adoption edit

Hi there; I see your question in your recent WP:RfA about adoption. Yes, there is such a programme; if you look at WP:ADOPT you will learn about it. Being adopted is a seriously good idea for new users - it enables them to develop, with guidance, their editing skills, to make fewer mistakes, and ultimately if wanted, provides help in developing skills necessary in order to achieve admin responsibility. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 17:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject New page edit

As you may know, the project is inactive, but I just joined. I thought that we should verify that each member is active. If you want to keep being in this wikiproject, please write "# {{user|Saverx}}" here; if you do not do it before 19:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC), you will be removed from the list. All the users that were removed will be put onto this page. Thank you,

~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply