Satabdirayi
| This is Satabdirayi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Gonzalo Garcés - BLP Sources edit
hello, Satabdirayi. I see you added {{BLP sources}} tag to the article about Garcés. Do you think you can point out what is unsourced or poorly sourced? so I try to fix it. Thanks --Sowairan (talk) 15:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Please, add reliable sources for his works and biography. Thanks, --Satabdirayi (talk) 16:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- I will definitely look for better citation usage from my next edits, thank you for helping me out. Satabdirayi (talk) 10:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Dipromisto Aticle edit
Hello, Satabdirayi ! I'm grateful for the corrections you've made in the article Dipromisto. That is my first article in Wikipedia - I'm sorry for its low quality and ready to improve it. I have changed it to meet better the Wikipedia's demands. I would be grateful if you check it and inform me if it is enough verifiable now and if it doesn't look as an advertisement any more or what I have to change more. Will be thankful for your help. OleAna (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
The subject is notable. [1] [2] [3] [4]
If you think the subject is not notable, delete the article. No point in putting a notability tag.Arunkapadia (talk) 16:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Jamie Rogan edit
My page was deleted, I only created the page around 30 minutes before and had no chance what so ever to add sources. F1insider (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please, use your sandbox for drafts. Please, contact the admin who deleted the page and you may request a copy at WP:REFUND. Thanks.--Satabdirayi (talk) 15:35, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
I added citation of printed books/catalogues per request. Why is this article still proposed for deletion?--Benjamintree (talk) 17:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Satabdirayi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 26 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valda Cooper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Farmington. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion, kindly guide me for putting up photographs without violating any Wikipedia policies. Satabdirayi (talk) 06:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on American Psychological Association edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page American Psychological Association, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Serious copyright problems edit
Your edit to Jonathan Kellerman has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:44, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Additionally, you've done the same thing at Irvin D. Yalom, Marjorie Wallace (SANE), Qatar National Vision 2030, Malcolm Gladwell, Angela Kinsey, and Natural gas in China.You also appear to have added a copyright violating image at Pam Belluck. I'll review the rest of your edits when I get time. Needless to say, this is a serious problem. Please do not edit further until you have acknowledged the problem and indicated how you will correct this. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Satabdirayi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Satabdirayi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
reason image text copyright, "I made a mistake while adding text to an image without realizing it. I sincerely apologize for my mistake and kindly request that I be blocked from editing or contributing to any pages on Wikipedia. This will allow me to educate myself on Wikipedia's policies before attempting to make any further contributions."
Decline reason:
It appears that despite my very stern warning, you again added blatant copyright violations to two more articles. Had I noticed this, I would have blocked your account. That is not the reason for the block that currently prevents you from editing, however; you will need to address the other accounts you are using as well and a checkuser will have to evaluate your response. Since you have not even tried to address that, I'm closing this request. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
That is not why this account is blocked. --Yamla (talk) 11:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Satabdirayi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello! Wikipedia Admin,
Request for Unblock:
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing in response to the notice you sent me regarding the removal of my edits on various Wikipedia articles, specifically those related to Jonathan Kellerman, Irvin D. Yalom, Marjorie Wallace (SANE), Qatar National Vision 2030, Malcolm Gladwell, Angela Kinsey, and Natural Gas in China. I also acknowledge the concern raised regarding a copyright-violating image added to the Pam Belluck article.
I want to sincerely apologize for any inadvertent copyright violations that may have occurred due to my edits. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's copyright policy, and I take this matter very seriously.
I do not hold the copyright to the materials in question and was not aware that the content I added may have infringed upon copyright guidelines. I appreciate your diligence in identifying and addressing these issues.
To rectify this problem, I will:
1. Review and familiarize myself with Wikipedia's copyright policies and guidelines thoroughly. 2. Ensure that all future contributions I make to Wikipedia are in compliance with copyright regulations by writing content in my own words and properly citing sources. Do not upload any copyrighted images or content without the appropriate permissions or licenses. 3. Make the necessary corrections to any copyright-violating content I may have added in the past, or, if necessary, remove such content entirely. 4. I understand that my actions may have caused concern, and I want to assure you that I am committed to rectifying this situation promptly and responsibly. I value the integrity of Wikipedia and the hard work put in by its community members to maintain accurate and reliable information.
Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention, and I appreciate your understanding as I work to address these issues. If you have any further guidance or recommendations for me, please do not hesitate to let me know. I am eager to learn and improve my contributions to Wikipedia. Kindly Unblock my account.
Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience or disruption my edits may have caused, and I look forward to contributing positively to the Wikipedia community in the future.
Sincerely, Satabdirayi
Decline reason:
This was likely written by an AI chatbot. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Request to Unblock my account from editing Wikipedia pages. I apologize for my mistakes. Satabdirayi (talk) 07:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Satabdirayi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello! I have been editing and contributing to Wikipedia pages for 8 years and I was blocked a few months ago. Regrettably, I have been blocked by one of the Wikipedia admins for copyright violations, and I apologize for it. I understand that I made a mistake and am willing to learn from it. Therefore, I kindly request that the block be lifted from my account so that I can continue contributing and editing Wikipedia pages.
Decline reason:
You need to show us that you understand exactly what it was that you did wrong and how you can and will avoid making similar mistakes in the future. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:42, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.