Sallyfitzgibbons

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sally Fitzgibbons. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Chevymontecarlo 14:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I have edited the article a few times and tried to group the sources into some logical order of Organisation, Newspapers, Online Magazines and then Sponsors. I have added more inline references as well. Can you be more specific with the part of the article that is concerning you? Martin Fitzgibbons

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sally Fitzgibbons was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! AJCham 23:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sally Fitzgibbons was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:50, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sally Fitzgibbons. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  22:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Can the article be put back in place please? I indicated I am travelling at the moment and won't have a good internet connection until at least next Wed when I may be able to work on it again. Thank you for your assistance. Sallyfitzgibbons (talk) 19:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sally Fitzgibbons

Hi, I've put the article submission on hold. I saw that there are quite a number of external links. External links should not exist in the article itself. You can convert them to citations or internal links(if they have a wikipedia article). You can also have a external links section but please make sure they comply to the guidelines here. Under the sources section I noticed that there are links under 'Surfing Organistions/Controlling Bodies', 'Newspapers', 'Online Surfing Publications', and 'Sponsors'. What are they for? Also, citations to Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources. It'll be great if you can change them. Bejinhan talks 13:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

I broke the sources into sections as the previous editor was telling me the sources were no good. What I was trying to do was reference that most of the information could be verified by by the surfing bodies ie the Professional Organisations that run the sport Sally Fitzgibbons is involved in, which in the case of results they are the originating source. Newspapers seemed to be the next best source as they verify facts before printing and the links to these were stories that verified some of the other info. Naturally Sponsors may be a biases source but they also had information on the subject. Should I remove all external links in the article?

I'm a bit confused by the sources but I guess I'll figure them out later. Do those sources in the sections already exist in the article? Wikipedia is not a reliable source, so you can remove it. No, you can leave all the external links in the External links section and I'll go through them. Also, please sign after leaving a message here by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~. Bejinhan talks 05:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Maybe I have doubled up on them in a few places. When the previous editor was questioning the content I decided to reference everything that factual to an external reference. So pretty much everything I wrote can be proved following the link to a reliable source. Then referenced to her sponsors which is where I came unstuck as I had written the Bio for her at the etnies.com site. Which meant I had to get etnies to release the text to the public domain. Bit confusing I know but its my first try. What I did do was look at the Wiki for Stephanie Gilmore the Number 1 surfer in the world as a guide but now when I look at it again it doesn't seem to hardly any references. Ben, how do I get back to the article? Sallyfitzgibbons (talk) 06:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

You can click on the header topic above or here. Please make the changes as soon as possible so that I can review them. You can put them into citation form like what you did for the rest, instead of external links. Bejinhan talks 05:56, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sally Fitzgibbons. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Bejinhan talks 10:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I will be travelling to Europe the next week so it might take a few days to get back to it but I will make changes asap. Sallyfitzgibbons (talk) 13:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I understand your travel will interfere, but it can't linger at AFC forever. I will go ahead and decline your article and userfy it (see WP:USERFY). It will be available at User:Sallyfitzgibbons/My article. —Duncan^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 22:21, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Sally Fitzgibbons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! —I-20the highway 13:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sally Fitzgibbons, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sallyfitzgibbons. You have new messages at Talk:Sally Fitzgibbons.
Message added 17:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

How to change your username

You can get your username changed. See WP:CHU. —I-20the highway 21:21, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

This account also needs to be blocked per WP:REALNAME: users are not permitted to edit under the real name of a well-known living person unless they are that person and can prove it via OTRS. This is all rather confusing, since there appears to be OTRS confirmation on this account permitting use of material from http://etnies.com/team/girl/sally-fitzgibbons. If you are not Sally Fitzgibbons but nonetheless a close associate, you should avoid editing this article and it probably should not have been created. -- Rrburke (talk) 01:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Sallyfitzgibbons, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 11:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)