November 2007 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Featured content. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 17:55, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I disagree. For this reasons: 1. Intentions (as far as I can understand them) 2. Results

'vandalism' is smthng different, though the edit in question was to be reverted:) It even might be left there as a (the) specific and funny 'mark' of Wikipedia and the reminder to the ourselves, editors:) And may be it only adds some appeal to the page:) Finally, if such edits were performed by many-many users many-many times... (which is not the case!) - it even wouldnt prevent Wiki page from being properly and comfortable accepted by a reader. _all_ jokes=vandilism isn't true. At least that subtle and 'wikiful':)

I'm leaving this comment because I dont want readers of this page to think this guy did smthng shameful and bad:) I woldnt be ashamed though i never did things alike.

haha sweet, to be honest, I'm normally againsed unproductive editing of wikipedia, but as i casually read the page I just could'nt resist =P I'm sure it won't happen again

Although it's true, the edit was to be reverted:)--85.141.89.119 03:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

December 2007 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Edgar Allan Poe for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. Dalekusa (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Norfolk TV edit

 

The article Norfolk TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability for this television station. Searches for Norfolk TV turn up information on Television Stations in Norfolk, Virginia. But I don't see anything that points to notability for this Australian Norfolk Island station.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Medival total war 2 map.PNG edit

 

The file File:Medival total war 2 map.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 17:27, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply