SMason2
I am not a sock puppett of SMason, I am SMason I just could not remember my password and was not aware that you are not allowed to create a new account. I just logged in as SMason a few seconds ago after remembering my password. Now I have two wiki accounts, help what do I do? I don't want to get in trouble with wikipedia for not knowing this was not allowed. Is there a way I can prove these are both me?
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of SMason (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Were you the photographer? Or did you scan this image from somewhere? – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes I took this picture but wish to remain anon, is that alright? I thought I specified this was my work and that I was releasing it to the public, please let me know if there is something else I should be doing here. Many thanks.
- Some people scan images from books and are under the (incorrect) assumption that they hold the copyright on the scan. I just wanted to clear up that you are the actual photographer, and that you therefore have the legal right to release the image under a free license. There's nothing else you need to do. Thanks for contributing the image! – Quadell (talk) (random) 21:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh I see, ok well then thanks for this information. Yes I definitely took the picture, thanks for your response and I'm glad to share it.
Proposed deletion of Camille Davila
edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Camille Davila, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Poly Records
edit
The article Poly Records has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)