May 2011

edit

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Two and a Half Men. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tgeairn (talk) 04:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011

edit

Please understand this: Since at least Episode 26, there has always been a component of "Running Man" episodes in which the participants are exposed to the general public and/or volunteer extras, who have cell phone cameras and smart phones and Twitter accounts. That means that nowadays, whenever Running Man tapes an episode, there will always be multiple tweets about it from witnesses who see crew taping in their neighborhood, and invariably, they take pictures and post them, too. This has been the case for a long time now, and the pictures and tweets get especially prolific when there are idols/former idols involved. Which is why I'm calling you out on your supposed "Episode 55 with Shinhwa" BS. There is no corroboration of this whatsoever, from official sources, or fans, or even random passersby.

Moreover, you have the audacity to post that this nonexistent episode is "Gwang Soo's last episode," when, as a matter of fact, at the very time you posted your lies, Episode 56 was being taped, and, as expected, Gwang Soo is with the cast. There is photographic evidence of this.

So either you're practically a vandal of the Running Man Episodes wiki page by posting your false information, or you're a patsy helping people who want to spread this BS. Either way, STOP IT. Mikejonas (talk) 23:30, 01 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


PLEASE stop trying to edit the List of Running Man episodes page. You have inaccurate information (your first two edits in your recent batch were complete falsehoods, and your two most recent ones were riddled with inaccuracies as to location and teams), and you do not know how to properly format the entry to fit with the existing table. STOP IT. Mikejonas (talk) 02:30, 02 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ford Motor Company, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ford Motor Company was changed by Runninmanofficial (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916548 on 2011-10-16T09:12:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ford Motor Company with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin 09:14, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ford Motor Company with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Deadly∀ssassin 09:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from S.M. Entertainment. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 06:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at S.M. Entertainment, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 07:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to S.M. Entertainment. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Random86 (talk) 07:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit

Thia is in relation to your recent edit in one of Running Man's articles, particularly to the Alleged departure of Lee Kwang Soo from the show. Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources.


--CommanderPhoenix (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Interstellarity. I noticed that you made a change to an article, President of the United States, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Interstellarity (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at President of the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SMP0328. (talk) 04:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disbandment

edit

Just to note as of this message, Iz*one still has not disbanded yet. Promotions for CFs and posts are still ongoing, and still have not yet officially announced that they have disbanded. Please stop spreading false rumours. Typhoon2013 (talk) 11:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's not promotions. They're just winding out the remaining videos that they filmed before final concert. You do know they all moved out and already went their separate ways, right? Stop being delusional and support then properly. If you can't even read the Korean articles, don't say anything. YOU'RE the one spreading false rumors. Runninmanofficial (talk) 18:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a source they already have moved out? Last article I've heard they are "moving out of their dorms at the end of this month (April)". You are the one spreading false rumours here, as it looks like with your previous cases/talk discussions. Doing this again, and I may have to report you. Typhoon2013 (talk) 09:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, CLC (group), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 04:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Paper9oll. Your recent edit(s) to the page Queendom (EP) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Marcus Rashford, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Marcus Rashford, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Marcus Rashford. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Marcus Rashford, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Marcus Rashford, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bruh. It's LITERALLY the same sources/sites used for Lisandro Martinez's source for the same thing. Stop reverting when he literally is the best player in form at the moment and I used actual srouces. Runninmanofficial (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Carmelo Anthony

edit

Just curious is there a reason why you reverted my edit removing Carmelo Anthony from the Nuggets retired number list? Did I miss any news? Troutfarm27 (Talk) 05:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I thought I reverted the one that HAD it on there... Runninmanofficial (talk) 10:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at STAYC, you may be blocked from editing. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at STAYC. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 03:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your edit summaries about Mattythewhite

edit

Your edit summaries about Mattythewhite are not very civil. No admin is going to ban him, so stop asking. PhilKnight (talk) 07:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Grow some thick skin. Stop being a pansy. Runninmanofficial (talk) 08:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wrong answer. Have a 1 week block. PhilKnight (talk) 08:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 PhilKnight (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Runninmanofficial. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Cabayi (talk) 11:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply