Welcome!

Hello, Rsspect, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Press Illustrated

A tag has been placed on Press Illustrated, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Press Illustrated. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Murderbike 01:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Press Illustrated?

edit

See User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Press Illustrated?. Anthony Appleyard 05:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Press Illustrated again

edit

Thanks for adding links to this article, but I'm afraid that you haven't addressed the main concerns. The links you've added are to Wikipedia's articles about terms used in the article. What you need to do instead is to establish notability by adding reliable third-party sources that discuss Press Illustrated. Feel free to ask if you need me to explain further. Best wishes, Jakew 12:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Jakew for the clarification. It's hard to understand these requirements as I am new to Wikipedia. Please, explain it further. Is a search engine listing or forums URL (e.g. google etc) of any good.
That's ok. In general, search engines and forums, blogs, etc should be avoided. Please see the policy on reliable sources. I suggest looking for sources like news articles, industry magazines and so on. Jakew 12:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
I hope you don't mind, but I reformatted the above to make our discussion easier to read. Jakew 12:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again for the clarifications. Looking for sources like news articles in online magazines is like searching for a needle in the bottom of an ocean. With a bit of luck, I was able to track one down and has listed it. Please, take a look and let me know if it meets the requirements. 16:11, 26 August 2007 User:Rsspect

My assessment is that it's a start, but it isn't by itself sufficient. Others may (and frequently do) disagree with me, however, so you might want to place a short note on the AfD page explaining that you've added the source. Jakew 19:10, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply