Insert non-formatted text here==Sting== Hello, I removed your request from Deletion Review since the article still exists and Deletion Review only deals with the deletion of whole articles. You should post your concern about the removed link at Talk:Sting. ~ trialsanderrors 21:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, Thanks for the info. But it was regarding a paragraph I added which was subsequently removed. How do I address that?

You should start a new subject at Talk:Sting and ask why it was removed. Alternatively, you can just add it back in. ~ trialsanderrors 07:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

thank you trialanderrors. Will do. Thanks again for taking the time to inform me, Cheers.

It appears there are some Sting fans editors that take exception to the fact even though I have provided several sources (when the asked for proof). Am I suppose to take it to wiki authorities. But I don't understand why they are taking exception to this. It's true, I have proof, and it gained wide interest and still does air on TV, etc. They seem to be taking this addition personally. I even provided the video.

Mediation case

edit

The mediation case regarding Sting (musician) is now open --nkayesmith 05:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sign your comments

edit

As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).For further info see the talk page guidelines. Thank you.--nkayesmith 05:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry and thanks. Like this?Rossdv 05:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)rossdvReply
No need to add rossdv after all your posts - simply adding ~~~~ will do that. --nkayesmith 10:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Like this? Is there a way to change my username (after all this)Rossdv 20:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:MontrealDVD.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MontrealDVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use disputed for Image:MontrealDVD.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:MontrealDVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MontrealDVD.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:MontrealDVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply