User talk:Rooney2pdx/sandbox

Evaluations

3/21/18 Evaluations By AFHW

Spelling/Grammar

Nearly Meets Standard

Note: Can't See Any.

Language

Meets Standard

Note: Good transition phrases. You can enrich your word choice, by adding some fancy words.

Organization

Needs Improvement Note: Your sentences are too long and choppy. You need to break them up. Altough there is good fluency with your transitional phrases at times.

Coding

Meets Standard

Note: Could have more blue links.

Validity

Meets Standard Note: Lots of information, if you condensed it for your edit then its your sources contain a lot of good information.

Completion

Meets Standard

Relevance

Meets Standard

Note: Good information.

Sources

Meets Standard

Citations

Meets Standard

References

Meets Standard

1/31/18 Evaluations By CSkita

Spelling/Grammar

Nearly Meets Standard

Note:There are a few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, and one being center is spelled incorrectly.

Language

Meets Standard

Note: "Larger on the musical map" can be a little confusing it would be better to standardize it if possible

Organization

Meets standard

Coding

Meets Standard

Note: Two seems to be broken.

Validity

Meets Standard

Completion

Meets Standard

Relevance

Nearly Meets Standard

Note:I think there is a bit of extra wording in there.

Such as the "Vocal Music in the choir setting was also taking new identity at this time." sentence you added.

Sources

Meets Standard

Citations

Meets Standard

References

Meets Standard

Note:I think that having more varied reference would be something to strive for as a way to expand further on the content.

1/31/2018 Evaluation by Jiayue

Spelling/Grammar Exceeds standard

Language Meets standard, I would say it was clear and easy to understand

Organization Nearly meets standard, I think you should add the header on the top of the paragraph

Coding Meets standards

Validity Exceeds standards,

Completion Nearly meets standards，because you mention some composers and musicians, I think that you should add some music works at that time.

Relevance Exceeds standards

Sources Exceeds standards

Citations Exceeds standards

References Meets standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiayue zhang (talk • contribs) 05:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

3/21/2018 Evaluation by [Jiayue]

Spelling/Grammar Meets Expectations

Language Meets Expectations Good encyclopedic tone and diction

Organization Does not meet standard. There are a long paragraph and no headers.

Coding Meet standard. few coding errors.

Validity nearly meet standard.

Completion Does not meet standard. this paragraph seems like a summary paragraph, and miss some specific and detail information for the Economy of Dulin.

Relevance nearly meets standard. Some irrelevant content. For example, there are much more information about the population growth and aged tendency of the population.

Sources Nearly meets standard.

Citations Meets Expectations

References Does not meet standard. The references formatting is not correct, and some reference you only leave the URL.