Ronjab

Feedback on your article

Hello Ronjab, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

• Intro sentence: good!
• Links: good!
• Headers: The order in what the headers are in the article should change to a chronological order: first the context, then the contents, then the reception.
• References: Very well! I do wonder what is the source of this: "Martin Greif is also the most cited poet in the book." as well as "Here, du Prel's perception of more to the mind than the conscious is addressed by Freud."
• Context/timeframe: In this section I expect to read about what has led to the existence of the book and the timeframe in what the book was written. A historical context can be part of it, but I do not read what has led to the existence of the book itself. Can this be added? Together the existing contents might need a bit rewriting.
• How was the book received: What I read in this section is good. I do wonder if you may be able to expand this section?
• Ready to publish: Not yet, you're halfway.

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before your final version. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 12:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)