Rod Rayanman

Sockpuppetry case

Latest comment: 13 years ago10 comments6 people in discussion

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Asafedi for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Rod Rayanman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

216.191.188.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Dozennoble". The reason given for Dozennoble's block is: "Vandalism".

Blocking administrator: John Reaves (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: I am afraid I have blocked your account; you seem to be the same person as Asafedi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who has created the hoax article Asafedi: you voted it to be kept (together with accounts like Asafedi2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) on its talk page, and you have used the same IP address as Dozennoble (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who attacked the administrator who deleted the page. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

HELP

Please unblock me. I am innocent I tell you. Please Rod Rayanman (talk) 21:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I AM INNOCENT, PLEASE UNBLOCK ME. I have information and names. I know other sockpuppets, real ones. Some of them are still active. If you unblock me I'll give their names. HELP Rod Rayanman (talk) 21:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC) Please unblock me. I have names, I HAVE NAMES. I am innocent I swear. Please if you are reading this, help. PLEASE HELP. HELPReply

Have you noticed that Asafedi is being remade under several new similar names? I know why I can help, I have names! I have names! Please help

Stop. Unblock me. I can help, I'm not a puppet. I'M NOT A PUPPET! Read this. PLEASE READ THIS give me sweet justice

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rod Rayanman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not a sockpuppet

Decline reason:

This is an internet encyclopedia, not a police interrogation, so the above is quite misplaced. You do not address the evidence given by Mike Rosoft for this block, so there is nothing for me to review. Sandstein 21:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, I am innocent. Please believe me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rod Rayanman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been accused of being a sockpuppet. I am not. I am using a shared IP, and simply commented on Asafedi with my own opinion on it. I thought it would be funny. Also I have names. I HAVE NAMES. Please help. Give me sweet justice, sweet sweet justice

Decline reason:

That's rather odd, then, that you would return after two years at the same time User:Pigstuffer is blocked for socking and User:Dozennoble also returns. From, I should note, not just the same IP address, but also the same computer. Curiously, there's a fourth account, User:Meatreaper, on your IP address that earlier today was also on the computer you're using now. You really are not looking very innocent right now. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh, and as Sandstein says, this isn't a police investigation, so going on about "I HAVE NAMES" is not going to get you unblocked. Knock it off. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I am using sharing a computer. Dozennoble is a friend of mine, as is pigstuffer. However, I have no idea who meatreaper is. Must be my brother or something.

Oh really. Just so you know, the "it's my brother" line doesn't get you very far either. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

yes, he is my brother. He is 10, has brown hair, blue eyes, has a growth mark on the back of his neck and loves starwars. Oh and yeah, he doesn't even have a computer so he uses mine. He doesn't even know what funny is. I have an older brother too, who has his own computer.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rod Rayanman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my final request. Yes, I am using a shared IP on a shared computor. Yes I personnel know dozennoble and Pigstuffer. They are both the sameperson, and should both be banned as sock puppets. I however, am someone else. I vote because I thought it would be funny, and it turns out it was fake. I only found the article since it was on my computers history. Finally the two year return is due to this computer being unused for awhile, at least by us, but our new computer broke so we used this one. My brother must be meatreaper. I would like to be unblocked, or at least have the reason changed from sockpuppitry to vandalism.

Decline reason:

You can blame your brother and your friends for getting you banned, then (you may wish to either beat up your brother or tell on your parents to get him grounded; you may also wish to tell your friends' parents that). In the meantime, your talk page editing privileges have been revoked. –MuZemike 22:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So if we believe you - which by the way I don't - then this is what we'd call meatpuppetry rather than sockpuppetry. Either way, the result is the same, an indefinite block for violation of policies. Wikipedia isn't your playground, so making edits because you thought they were funny isn't a great reason to be making them. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you chose to continue blocking me its fine. I'll just watch family guy if I want to do something funny. But can you please change it from sock puppetry to vandalism?

Add topic