User talk:Roberticus/Archivef2014Thu, 06 Mar 2014 03:42:36 +000003am31= 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
117.214.68.50 (talk) 12:37, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Since you did not respond, I write here. I am one of the strangest vandal, you would have met, in your still comparatively young career as a Wikipedia [wonderful site though] editor. IMO, the best way to deal with me, is to report me to an admin and let him. But it would be good we could talk, isn't it [is it allowed to chat on talk pages]? Why do you think editing should be done with registration, it would drive you out of business. Infact, much of the useful contributions are made by the anonymous users, its another matter that most of the vandalism is made by us too. But that is what users like you are for, and keeping this great site great. Besides, did you notice that I made another interesting vandal edit, on your favorite book. Was it interesting? And yes, History Channel, used to be good but .. 117.214.68.50 (talk) 12:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Why are you silent? 117.214.68.50 (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks for the messages,
it isthey are pretty interesting... but you keep edit conflicting me Roberticus (talk) 13:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)- Oh. And my edits? I am thinking of some more interesting edits. Keep a watch. 117.214.68.50 (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- When you are unblocked (or create an account), why not make constructive edits; whether content addition or anti-vandal work, it is more rewarding because if it's a good change, it is kept, and even when you have to battle a vandal, or person who doesn't understand NPOV or GNG, it is more rewarding because you set something wright which once went wrong... Roberticus (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Copyediting, grammar, diction or syntax work (isn't it called "gnoming?) is also worthwhile... Roberticus (talk) 13:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Not to intrude on what would no doubt be a delightful and productive conversation, but whilst your attempts to rehabilitate this IP editor are commendable, I'd suggest you don't feed the trolls... Yunshui 雲水 13:43, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Copyediting, grammar, diction or syntax work (isn't it called "gnoming?) is also worthwhile... Roberticus (talk) 13:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- When you are unblocked (or create an account), why not make constructive edits; whether content addition or anti-vandal work, it is more rewarding because if it's a good change, it is kept, and even when you have to battle a vandal, or person who doesn't understand NPOV or GNG, it is more rewarding because you set something wright which once went wrong... Roberticus (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh. And my edits? I am thinking of some more interesting edits. Keep a watch. 117.214.68.50 (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: School 81
Hello Roberticus, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of School 81, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Olaf Davis (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)