Rkhramov

Speedy deletion of Scale Solutions

A tag has been placed on Scale Solutions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Alinnisawest(talk) 21:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Scale consulting etc

Hi - thanks for the email. We prefer the transparency of on wiki communication generally so that others can see what has happened.

There are a number of issues involved here. You have created two pages about an organisation or organisations that you are involved with. This runs against our conflict of interest policies. Equally the one I deleted (another admin deleted your other page) I checked with another experienced user (here) and they agreed with my view that there issues of notability. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:32, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

As I said above - communication on wiki is preferred so that others may see all the exchanges.

As to the two pages - your email makes no sense. You created two pages, both were deleted but by different admins, neither were empty. So two different admins both took the same view of your pages it seems to me.

I pointed you to the interaction between myself and another user where we agreed the organisation was not notable.

I am certainly assuming you have some interest in the organisation from your insistence on the subject.

You are welcome to look at this page for instructions on seeking review of the deletions (I assume both trouble you although they appear to be about the same organisation). Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Again - you type responses, queries etc here on wiki on talk pages usually. That way others can see what is going on. I've pointed you to instruction on how to deal with this. I have pointed you to the fact that two different admins took the same decision on the pages you created both of whom had the opinion of another user. That is the way Wikipedia works. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

If I may interject, the article was empty of content. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. As such it has rules and regulations. Articles have to have some content indicating what the subject is about. Yours didn't. Also articles have to show notability of their subject through verifiable sources. Lastly, in case you have a conflict of interest in the subject you want to write about, please read BFAQ. Hope this helps you understand how Wikipedia works. Thank you. -- Alexf⁴² 10:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)