Richard34761
Hi. What game where? Gigs (talk) 15:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated Ner'zhul, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ner'zhul (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Gigs (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Richard34761
edit A tag has been placed on Richard34761 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 23:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
edit
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Richard34761, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Magic item. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:42, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Richard34761. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Richard34761, you will be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)