I think this is a good start. Might read easier if there were some section breaks. Just a suggestion though. Raterfayed (talk) 22:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I thought you did a great job editing. Does fox have a wikipeidia page already? Have you tried to merge content or publish this article yet?Medina sod (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Nice job on your project. I think you are actually more comfortable with Wikipedia than me! I was very impressed. StudyComm270 (talk) 17:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Wow, great job! Like seeing the new logo. Your article structure seems to take advantage of all the Wikipedia functions——linking content internally and externally. Louischatte (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Very nice job. I agree with Louis, your article structure links content both ways. I now know a little bit more about Fox. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baires78 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Agreed! Your article had the look and feel of a real, certified Wikipedia page. Did you happen to edit the actual article? I'm interested in hearing what kind of feedback each student received regarding whether or not their content was accepted or rejected. MComitor (talk) 22:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I aggree with the above, you did a good job. Your graphic linking it to the fox family, the formatting of your page, and your content would make this a solid addition to Wikipedia. It was worth the wait at last Tuesdays class :) Chigibby (talk) 13:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)