Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Early human migrations. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 20:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

What I have done, which is within the gamut of respectable scientific comment, is to Precis the subject matter of the article, provide evidence of existing situations to support my statements and then given a link to the original. The original is already quoted as a reference for this article (Reference # 12). So every requirement has been met and the information should be accepted. And I must ask politely, what are your qualifications to be criticising what I wrote? Arthur Harris (Rferau).

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply