Replystay

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:Endroit. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Endroit 10:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

i write 'normal' discusstion with him. is it serious? [1] Replystay 10:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't think constantly undoing his deletions is the best way to try and get attention about disputes over content.--Kerotan^Talk Have a nice day :) 10:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

but, he delete my discussion article. is it best way? [2]Replystay 11:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

He believes you to be a sockpuppet and I am inclined to agree with him, so really I don't think any level of disscusion will work because you seem to have a secret agenda.--Kerotan^Talk Have a nice day :) 11:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

first of all, i'm not socket puppet. second, he delete my discussion article continually.[[3][[] Replystay 11:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I think you editing patterns alone are showing you are a sock puppet and a major one at that. 11 accounts blocked and I suspect you won't stop there or stop filing false accusations of sockpuppetry against other users. Instead of using sockpuppets to evade blocks, try following the policies of Wikipedia. It makes everyone life at little easier and stop denying this sockpuppetry, you are not fooling anyone with your act. Xtreme racer 04:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)