March 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Realmalang (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Admin, It’s to put in your kind notice that, I have never ever tried to promote any profile in particular.

I am Kashmiri Expat living so away from my native,the legitimate truth is I’m the regular listener of Sufi (Mystic Music) music from AR Music Studios record label as it promotes the folk and Sufi music of my native. After being a regular listener it created a little curiosity and interest in me by looking at its accomplishments and it’s way of maintaining Aesthetics and Sanctity of Kashmiri art and Culture.
If you Beleive I have made such contribution in Unbridled passion, I’m so sorry as I had no such intentions and I truly respect Wikipedia guidelines.
I have never considered Wikipedia as promotional tool but a prestigious platform where I believe we should put up the profiles who have added value to this world so that value is in record to be shared with the future generations.
Blocking has really distraught me by not even considering my contribution from all these years.
I really won’t compel for unblock but , I would like you to check when and where I have contributed for promotional activity.
It was just a draft Yet to be fixed . I hadn’t moved it to main space , I wants to make changes to it unfortunately by the time I could make changes I saw my user ID was blocked.
I request please check out my contribution and review my user.
i believe that I should be given a chance and I will never in future write articles which grabs my personal interest.
GodspeedRealmalang (talk) 07:21, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I don't know if you are associated with AR Music Studio or you are just a passionate fan, but for whatever reason you're not able to edit about it as Wikipedia requires- so you won't be unblocked to contribute about them. We will need to know what topics you will edit about instead in order to consider unblocking you. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Realmalang (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear User talk:HJ Mitchell & 331dot (talk) The State of Kashmir and its cultural products are a topic of incredible sensitivity. There is a sizeable amount of misinformation about Kashmir due to recent unavoidable events. There is so much peace and love that comes out of Kashmir through the form of its poets and its music, its humanitarians and its historical leaders. I care about truth, void of platform or party. Truth that promotes peace, and understanding of my home country which I know so well, but is continually misunderstood by foolish radicals who mistake truth for belief. Your reason here Realmalang (talk) 09:09, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This adds nothing to your prior, declined, unblock request. Looks like Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Yamla (talk) 10:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Realmalang (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

To Respected admins I request for the unblock because, i fully understand i am being blocked for my un-intentional promotional submission of article regarding - record label.

With all due respect and faith in you as an experienced admins, I apologise since this article in particular has looked promotional.

I assure I will never ever do it again in future , instead I will make productive contributions and avoid contributing about personal likings.

I believe I should be given a chance to prove my self better with future contributions.

@HJ Mitchell:

Realmalang (talk) 01:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
      • and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 12:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Realmalang (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear 331dot, 331dot (talk) I appreciate your response and the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to positively contribute to Wikipedia. I understand that my past behavior has led to my block, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption caused. To earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community, I am willing and ready to follow the steps you have outlined. I will familiarize myself with the basic rules and guidelines, as well as read the guide to improving articles. I have chosen the article Sufism or Jaan Nissar Lone to propose improvements to. I will carefully review the selected portion of the article and make substantial, well-researched edits that adhere to relevant policies. I understand that minor corrections or unreferenced additions are not sufficient, and I will strive to make significant contributions. Once I have completed my work, I will follow the instructions provided to re-request unblocking, I hope that my proposed edits will showcase my dedication to improving Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. If I encounter any difficulties or require assistance during this process, I will add Help me and question to my talk page. Thank you for considering my request, and I look forward to the opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia once again. Sincerely Realmalang (talk) 21:23, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Instead of following the instructions given to you, all you've done here is rephrase them back at us. Look, I'm sorry, but it looks like we've got a problem here that can't be ignored. Maybe it's a language barrier, or maybe you're using an AI chatbot to write your unblock requests (which would explain why your response completely misses the point here). Whatever the issue is, you're just not getting it. Perhaps you'd have an easier time if you edited the version of Wikipedia in your native language. There is nothing special about English Wikipedia – it is not the prestige version of Wikipedia. You can still make further unblock requests via WP:UTRS, as below, but I would ask that any reviewing administrator please ensure that you're going to follow instructions instead of just repeating them back at us if your talk page access is restored. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.