Ravimahato123

August 2015

Your recent editing history at Raashid Alvi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please note that if you revert to your version 4 times in a day will end up with you being blocked. Using alternate accounts to get around this will also end up with you being blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 17:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

And you are ALREADY at 4 reverts. Any further reverts to your version will result in you being reported to the WP:EWN. Ravensfire (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hamdirfan987, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ravensfire (talk) 17:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ravimahato123 reported by User:Ravensfire (Result: ). Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 17:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Friendly advice - if you want to have any chance of not being blocked for edit-warring, you need to self-revert your last edit and start using the article talk page. There are multiple issues raised there that you in your many previous accounts simply ignore. You also need to carefully review all of the edits you want to make and see how other editors have viewed them in the past. You also need to address those on the article talk page. Wikipedia works on a WP:CONSENSUS basis which you have ignored in this account and in your previous accounts. That doesn't work. You MUST use the article talk page to explain your edits, how they are inline with Wikipedia policies and convince others to support your changes. Continuing on as you have been will result in you being blocked and the article protected to prevent further changes to your preferred version. Ravensfire (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2015 (UTC)