Rapidspacezzz

Pack of pedophiles

I notice that accounts and users claiming to be pedophiles are now pretty common at YouTube. For example 4boysonic and his 100 friends. Does this mean the disease is becoming more accepted by people and that now kids are much more at risk when they surf internet unsupervised? Rapidspacezzz (talk) 18:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Nope. Just is a reflection of how hard YouTube is to regulate, and the differences between the policies of websites. Wikipedia for example is much easier to regulate with regards to such such users because, being an encyclopedia, it is actually very organized in a topical way. Pages relate to one another and every user or IP address is traceable, and we have admins with the power to ban. YouTube is random and nearly infinite, with very little that connects one channel or video to another, and little or no admin process to mediate or remove offending content. It's already filled to the brim with unauthorized copyrighted videos, violence and hate speech.

What are you asking me about this for? I'm nobody special; not an admin or moderator. Do I know you from somewhere? Did you used to just post with an IP address?Legitimus (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

We know you because you are a contributor to the pages about pedophilia and are an expert on the psychology side of that. I asked the question above because there were people on a forum who were wondering if Wikipedia is as evil as those NAMBLA or Boychat sites, since there was little regulation on pro-pedophile content. It appears that YouTube now surpasses Wikipedia by over 9000 miles as a booth for pro-pedophile propaganda, as evidenced by the presence of those channels which are still live today (despite people reporting them to YouTube staff). Pointeager111 (talk) 13:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)