March 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ravana Rajputs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. A blogspot post is not an acceptable source. utcursch | talk 14:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

That source has been removed multiple times now, as it is describing "Daroga" and does not mention "Ravana Rajputs". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

respected sir, Ravana Rajputs and daroga both are same you can check the second reference of ravana rajput page book-Religion and Rajput Women: The Ethic of Protection in Contemporary Narratives. Url-https://books.google.co.in/books?id=7HLrPYOe38gC&pg=PA145&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.%7C quote-The rajput community would not have accepted her children as rajputs, they would be darogas(also called as Ravana Rajputs). thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajasthan Kshatriya (talkcontribs)

@Rajasthan Kshatriya: You should use that book as the source in that case. utcursch | talk 13:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

@utcursch first thing is that daroga and ravana rajputs both are same, according to reference 2 given by you in ravana rajput page. i request you to add (Quote-They mostly follow the customs of rajputs and nata (widow remarriage) is permitted among them). i tried but you people are not accepting anything. please. thank you.