Rahmanjamaal

Re: Notability

Sorry, you will have to excuse that- 'vanity' just means that it was written by the subject, which is discouraged by WP:AUTO and WP:COI. As for the new sources- neither of the ones linked to in the article count for anything, as they are not third party- one was written by you, and the other was written by the school you work for. It would be best, from now on, to state your case for keeping the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahman jamaal, which is where the community is now debating whether the article is kept. Again, apologies if I seem blunt- I deal with a lot of pages like this, there is somewhat of an understanding among Wikipedians that no one is trying to offend anyone else, as explained at WP:AGF, and so, because we see things similar to this all the time, we have developed a sort of slang. Of course, don't take the deletion personally, I have absolutely nothing agaisnt you, I just feel we need to uphold the notability rules. J Milburn 12:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)