Raggio

Project European Union

Hello Raggio, you are member of the project European Union. I try to create a new project page for the project. You can see it at here Because this should be the project page for all it´s members, please tell me, what you think about it. Please leave your comments on the talkpage of the project.--Thw1309 11:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Education and Training 2010

Hi Raggio. You are off to such a great start on the article Education and Training 2010 that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. Appearing on the Main Page would help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 20:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

EU page

Hi, sorry to bring up the European Union article again, I know it can get tedious. Basically it is about the city table. Small point but we've been wanting to replace it, thus far Lear has been the only one wanting the old and has reverted any changes. A summery of options has been written up, I'd appreciate it if you'd give a comment. Don't mind what you pick as it will either help convince Lear to compromise for once or it will legitimise what he is doing (if he has support I don't mind, so long as it is not him alone). See here for the summery. If you could pop an opinion I'd be grateful before it turns into 3 pages of "standard content" vs "consensus" again. I understand if you don't want to or don't have time to. Thanks! - J Logan ^t: 13:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Authorized King James Version

You'll need to source your assertion. My understanding is that your statement is incorrect. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:Signature

The mathfrak in the signature are images? I didn't even know. I'll change the sig then. Thanks for the heads-up. ${\mathfrak {s}}{\mathfrak {a}}{\mathfrak {v}}{\mathfrak {i}}{\mathfrak {o}}{\mathfrak {r}}$ ${\mathfrak {s}}{\mathfrak {e}}{\mathfrak {l}}{\mathfrak {f}}$${\mathfrak {.}}$${\mathfrak {7}}{\mathfrak {7}}{\mathfrak {7}}$ 21:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Your sig

is 350 characters. WP:SIG only allows 255 characters for a sig. Please change your sig to meet WP:SIG's guidelines. Thank you. ₰imon^KSK 01:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm nice, so I reduced it for you. There are no changes to how it looks. I just changed the code a bit. Note that I made your guestbook into superscript, cause otherwise it would have not went under 255.

Go to preferences. Go to Sig box and put this in:
<font face=jokerman color=DarkBlue>[[User:Raggio|'''''Raagio''''']][[User talk:Raggio|^T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Raagio|_C]]</font>[[User:Raagio/Guest Book|^{<font face=jokerman color=green>Guest Book</font color>}</font>]]
Check raw sig and Save it. ₰imon^KSK 02:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

It's pretty tricky. It works like this. You edit the page, but the page doesn't really change until a "checker" comes and checks to see if your edit is not vandalism. In my opinion, it will fail pretty badly. Imagine how much work a checker will have to do during a PPV. It will be chaos. This thing also violates our motto: "The free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." Instead it gets turned into "The free encyclopedia that only some people can edit." It is just wrong. ₰imon^KSK 02:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)