All parts of the controversy should be reported, even if, with hindsight today, the criticism seems today unfair or fully responded to. We are not engaged in Historical revisionism (negationism), nor should we refining section after section of [contemporary criticism of the Rind Report] in violation of Wikipedia policy. All of this criticism should be deleted and presented as history of the controversy. [Or consider revising] all this "criticism" with a proportional amount of "praise." There are a number of good sources that offer the Rind Report solid praise, and none of it has yet been included here in violation of NPOV and WP:POVSTRUCTURE]. Radvo (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2012 (UTC)