Raddman26
Welcome
editGreetings, Raddman26, and welcome to Wikipedia's deletion process! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Wikipedia's deletion policy, and the pages describing the articles for deletion process, proposed deletion, and speedy deletion. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research, and what Wikipedia is not, and to the consensual community guidelines for biographies, corporations, music, and fiction. Also remember that deletion is not always the answer to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome! czar · · 05:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Blocked
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
Raddman26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Nope, not sock puppet'ing. Check my IP, this is my account and it is the only account I have. Discrimination is not appreciated. Raddman26 (talk) 11:57 am, Today (UTC−5)
Decline reason:
It strains credibility to ask us to imagine that you created your account, to bee-line to the exact same page as a user who had just been blocked, to start making the exact same arguments, all entirely by coincidence. (I am also unsure on what criteria you are asserting you have been discriminated against on the basis of.) - Vianello (Talk) 19:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- There is no discrimination. This account was created right around the same time Tethria (talk · contribs) was blocked for sockpuppetry (Fonatag (talk · contribs) was the sock), and this account's contributions focus on the exact same subject area, specifically, the deletion of the Steve Wilk article that Tethria created. If it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it's a WP:DUCK. There's clearly a relationship. This account either belongs to Tethria or Fonatag or both. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)