December 2007

edit

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Premature birth. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MKoltnow 06:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

lilaussieprem account *spam*

edit
Accounts

Lilaussieprem (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Rackospacko (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Hu12 (talk) 06:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Abusing sock puppet accounts: sock of indef. blocked user Lilaussieprem. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

slakrtalk / 06:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rackospacko (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, i am not a spam bot and apologise for breaking the rules, i was wondering why the links were disappearing. I should have read the rules further. I am not contesting to have lilaussieprems account unblocked however the website www.prembaby.org.au is a resource website that should be on that page as it includes 6 support groups from around Australia and there are no Australian websites filed in that list of links. If it could please be re added i will certainly not add any of the other sites again. From what i read this is my first warning so is there anyway that rackospacko can be unblocked and lilaussieprem be deleted?

Decline reason:

Its aparent these accounts are related and are WP:SPA WP:SOCK spam only account created to promote related sites — Hu12 (talk) 08:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry again, thanks