RXEN

Talk!

April 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with De Mirage. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello.

I understand the reason, but the source is not a bad example: According to Speedy Deletion instructions I don't think it should be.

Because there are verified non-advertising sources.

Regards! RXEN (talk) 06:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

It's not a Speedy deletion nomination, it's a Articles for deletion nomination, they're different things. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 06:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

I know, sorry, I was wrong.

I wish you all the best. RXEN (talk) 06:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you.1AmNobody24 (talk) 06:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:VALONSA per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VALONSA. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 21:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)