March 2016 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at User:REDTMR1. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You are not an administrator. They do not consider it a joke. Please take this on board, unless you wish to encounter one sooner than is healthy for a productive editing career. Cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

REDTMR1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

REDTMR is my brother I use REDTMR1 because it makes it easier to remember REDTMR1 (talk) 03:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Uh huh. And which of you is User:Trobinson17? --jpgordon::==( o ) 04:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.