Please stop adding Patent Nonsense: Conor canavan edit

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Conor canavan. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Casper2k3 16:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

To RDLP715: please provide evidence that Minty's Heroes is real: there are zero Google hits for both "Minty's Heroes" and "Mintys Meadow Publishing". Otherwise, that article, and all of its subsidiary articles, will be deleted as unverifiable, non-notable, and/or patent nonsense. -- Karada 17:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Giving an domain name for a website that is unregistered , and claiming that it is "down", does not constitute proof. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Given that your edits otherwise look like patent nonsense, and you have not responded with verifiable proof that their subject (a) exists (b) is verifiable (c) is not "original research", I cannot see any reason why they should not be speedy deleted; therefore, as per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion CSD1, I have done so. Also, please read WP:NOT, particularly the bit about advertising. -- Karada 18:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Seisiún edit

 

The article Seisiún has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 18:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply