User talk:RA0808/Archives2018/December

Latest comment: 5 years ago by RA0808 in topic Re: Jill Whelan

Re:Liberal Party of Canada

Hi I was wondering why my edit was reverted? IsabelleFlake (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

@IsabelleFlake: I was just in the midst of typing a note on your talk page, but I'll reply here instead. I reverted your edit to Liberal Party of Canada because it removed appropriate cited information without stating an appropriate reason. In your edit summary you cited WP:SPS but that guideline does not apply to the source you removed. The Bittner and Koop 2013 source saying the Liberals are a centrist party is not self-published. It comes from a book published by the University of British Columbia Press, a reputable academic publisher that is owned by the University of British Columbia. This also goes against the posted notice to discuss and garner consensus on the talk page before changing party ideology or position. Hope this clears things up! RA0808 talkcontribs 19:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Zhob airport

PIA suspended operation there, go check their website schedule. 45.116.232.31 (talk) 22:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Re: Jones Shafroth Act

The edit summary DID state the reason: the cited material was a DEAD LINK, therefore invalid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.30.58.160 (talk) 20:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

You removed over 9,300 characters of content including a reference list of 4 academic sources and multiple Wikipedia sorting categories. That edit summary was not a sufficient nor appropriate reason for the edit you made. If you have concerns about an article's content please discuss at the talk page. Continuing such massive content removals without sufficient reasoning may lead to a temporary block for disruptive editing. RA0808 talkcontribs 20:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

OH MY GOD! RA, you are absolutely right! I edited the ORIGINAL version of the piece, from several years ago, and DID NOT realize I was therefore re-instating that ORIGINAL VERSION! Please forgive me for that...it was certainly NOT intentional! I know this appears like vandalism...but that was NOT my intent!

THANK YOU for bringing this to my immediate attention. I really appreciate it, and feel like a fool! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.30.58.160 (talk) 20:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Please accept my apology for this error -- inadvertent, but a big error nonetheless! Thanks again.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.30.58.160 (talk) 20:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

No need to apologize, if you say you didn't intend any vandalism then I'll take your word for it. Apologies are due from me since my initial response came off a bit curt. If you'd like to get a bit of practice with the editing interface feel free to check out the WP:SANDBOX too! RA0808 talkcontribs 20:41, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

sorry

i didnt know this would affect others please forgive me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:A204:1EA0:B9BA:C806:E366:30D3 (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

What?

Why do I have do comment on Content and not on other users. 86.144.116.189 (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Because personal attacks are not conducive to a collaborative environment. Please see WP:NPA for further information. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes they are, I do them all the time! 86.144.116.189 (talk) 21:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


Also why can I not edit my user page? 86.144.116.189 (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/873220939

What words in the edit make it non-neutral? The links I have added does not make the edited content opinionated Rohit IDMS (talk) 21:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Link to the edit revert https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/873220939 Rohit IDMS (talk) 21:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Re: Jill Whelan

It is completely true Jill Whelan did Ronco infomercials for the Showtime BBQ. Do a search on YouTube. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.119.24.34 (talk) 21:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds material. RA0808 talkcontribs 22:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)