Explanation of reversion

edit

Hi. I just reverted this apparent deletion by you in the Ferdinand Magellan article of a link to an online copy of a work, complaining that the dead-tree version is long out of print. Perhaps I misunderstand your reasons for reversion. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I assumed it was referring to the out of print book version. --QQ747 (talk) 16:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply