PwninROD
August 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dalziel High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 22:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Bsadowski1 21:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
PwninROD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My Dalziel High School entry was not intended to be malicious. It was intended as a joke as I attend the near-by school of Our Lady's High School. There is an un-official rivalry between our schools and this was intended as a joke. Furthermore I find it quite stupid that I have been banned for the period of time which I have. If I had edited a page which many people used for reference and study purposes I would agree with my punishment, although I would not do this anyway as I am an avid user of wikipedia and realise how helpful it can be. However I seriously doubt that many people are using the Dalziel High School for reference, study purposes and ratings as Dalziel High School has its own official website with its own official statistics and news. I feel that more people would use the official website as wikipedia has a reputation for not being entirely reliable. I would also just like to clarify that some of the information I wrote was indeed true. I think that the administrators have been uneccessarily harsh with my punishment. Anything I wrote on the Dalziel High School page was taken off within an hour and a half of me writing it so I seriously doubt that many people would have seen what I wrote, if any for that matter.
Decline reason:
It doesn't matter how low profile an article it is, it doesn't make it ok for you to vandalise it, if wikipedia is seen as unreliable its largely because of idiots messing up articles. This is as serious project, not a playground Jac16888Talk 21:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
PwninROD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Is it cause I is black?
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
PwninROD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please can I be un-blocked? I promise to never intentionally vandalise a page again, although I still stand by my belief that some of the stuff I wrote was true.
Decline reason:
I don't see how allowing you to edit again would help the encyclopedia. Especially if you stand by your vandalism as constructive. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
PwninROD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
There is vandalism, which tends to be malicious and hurtful, and then there is having a joke with some people that go to another school, some of whom happem to be my friends. Lick me.
Decline reason:
No, there is only one kind of vandalism, which is what you were doing. Your emotions while you were vandalizing are not relevant at all; only your actions matter. Since you've now had four independent reviews of your block and showed no likelihood of making any useful edits to Wikipedia in the near future, I've disabled your access to this talk page. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:51, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.