November 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sister 7, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sister 7 was changed by Ppike7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-11-28T06:27:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia

edit

Hi Ppike7, and thank you for your contributions to Patrice Pike. Unfortunately, the material you added fails to meet the guidelines established in WP:CITE. This means the stuff you added must be deleted unless you can point to a verifiable third-party source for this information. The fact that you, as Patrice's "personal assistant" know this information is correct does NOT satisfy WP:CITE. If you don't understand why I am saying this to you, please make sure you have read and understood that guideline on citation. ALL material added MUST be cited. It's not that I don't like your additions; it's just the rules.Eaglizard (talk) 00:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply