March 2013

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Process (engineering) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal Iblock by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:12, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pop9pop99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Friend had access to account and edited pages Pop9pop99 (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Yes, you created an account, and left the room for two days during which time your friend made a series of silly edits. You haven't made any worthwhile edits yourself. Please see WP:BROTHER. Peridon (talk) 12:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pop9pop99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have changed my password so as my friend no longer has access to my account, so there should not be any more vandalizing edits from my account. I'm sorry for any inconvenience caused by this incident, and I'll do all within my power so this doesn't happen again. If this type of edit happens again, I understand and accept the fact that my account will be blocked again. Pop9pop99 (talk) 17:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Nothing but vandalism from this account. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:54, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pop9pop99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Which is what I'm trying to fix Pop9pop99 (talk) 11:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If, as you say, your friend had access to this account, then the account is by your admission compromised and cannot be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pop9pop99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Which was the case, but when I realized there was a breech, I immediately changed my password. Pop9pop99 (talk) 12:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

What part of that last denial didn't you understand? Per generally accepted computer-security procedures and common sense, we do not unblock compromised accounts. Ever. Since I don't want this charade to go on, I am revoking your talk page access. If you really want to edit productively, start another account. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.