Poemsnewly

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poemsnewly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm a newbie and yet you blocked me, you should block FunkeyFly, he made me do 3 reverts

Decline reason:

You are responsible for your own actions. If you are not willing to accept this, please let us know so we can block you indefinitely. — Yamla 19:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Warning

Do not revert Template:Slavic languages again or you will violate Wikipedia:3RR, and will be blocked.   /FunkyFly.talk_  18:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User:FunkyFly, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating the 3 reversion rule. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Very wrong, you should block also FunkyFly, he did the same.--Poemsnewly 18:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I did not revert more than 3 times, and you did Bonaparte.   /FunkyFly.talk_  18:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

He only reverted 3 times which is not breaking the rule. However, being you did, i reverted it to the previous state. Please do not engage in edit wars once this block expires. Should you violate the rule again, the block time will be lengthened. Thank you. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

←You were given a warning, which you read, then removed as "trolling". You understood what you were doing. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

One moment please, I gave him the possibility to talk on page. He refused it. I said don't blind revert on talk page. He ignored it. Instead he warned me on my own page. I warned him also. --Poemsnewly 18:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Bonaparte, you can twist it all you want. Your edits are totally unsourced and were removed.   /FunkyFly.talk_  18:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

The fact is, he stopped at 3, you continued. in 24 hours, it will expuire. you were warned, you knew what you were doing and did it anyways. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Chris, you don't see? I saw that he didn't want any discussion. He could have answered on talk page if he wanted. He refused any dialog. Why didn't he replied to my invitation of dialog on talk page where I said "don't blind revert?" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ASlavic_languages&diff=117088561&oldid=111451745 --Poemsnewly 18:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I stay out of edit conflicts. I really dont care who said what. you could have stopped, given it 24 hours and if you wanted gone at it again. There are plenty of ways to handle disputes and knwoingly going against policies is not the way to do that. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

He reverted my tag even if the article exeeds 50k.Poemsnewly 19:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FunkyFly