Welcome to Wikipedia! WilliamH (talk) 03:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Table sample

edit
Extended content

This:

{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; height:100px;" cellpadding="5"
|-
! style="width:20%;"| Device Type
! style="width:20%;"| Stability Rating
! style="width:30%;"| Applications
! style="width:30%;"| Comments
|-
| XO - Oscillator
| 20 - 100 ppm
| Those requiring a general-purpose clock, such as consumer electronics and computing, for driving:
*microprocessors
*digital state machines
*video and audio clocking
*low-bandwidth data communications, e.g., USB and Ethernet
|-
| VCXO - Voltage Controlled Oscillator
| < 50 ppm
| Clock synchronization in:
*telecom
*broadband
*video
*instrumentation
|Clock outputs are pullable, i.e., their frequency can be pulled or fine-tuned. VCXO outputs can be pulled using an analog voltage input.
|-
|}

will make this:


Device Type Stability Rating Applications Comments
XO - Oscillator 20 - 100 ppm Those requiring a general-purpose clock, such as consumer electronics and computing:
  • microprocessors
  • digital state machines
  • video and audio clocking
  • low-bandwidth data communications, e.g., USB and Ethernet
This was the first product category to be supplied by MEMS oscillators
VCXO - Voltage Controlled Oscillator < 50 ppm Clock synchronization in:
  • telecom
  • broadband
  • video
  • instrumentation
Clock outputs are “pullable,” i.e., their frequency can be “pulled” or fine-tuned. VCXO outputs can be pulled using an analog voltage input.
TCXO – Temperature Compensated Oscillator

and

VC-TCXO - Voltage Controlled TCXO

0.5 - 5 ppm High-performance equipment that requires very stable frequencies:
  • networking
  • base stations
  • femtocells
  • smart meters
  • GPS systems
  • mobile systems
VC-TCXO outputs are pullable
SSXO – Spread Spectrum Oscillator 20 - 100 ppm Microprocessor-based clocking:
  • desktop PCs
  • laptops
  • storage systems
  • USB
Reduces EMI in systems that are clocked from the oscillators
FSXO – Frequency Select Oscillator 20 - 100 ppm Those requiring frequency agility and multi-protocol serial interfaces. Clock output frequencies are changeable with hardware or serial-select inputs, reducing BOM and simplifying the supply chain
DCXO – Digitally Controlled Oscillator 0.5 - 100 ppm Clock synchronization in
  • telecom
  • broadband
  • video
  • instrumentation
Clock output frequencies are pulled by digital inputs.

Rows

edit

Lots of rows!

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width:100%; height:100px;" cellpadding="5"
|-
! style="width:33%;"| Column 1
! style="width:20%;"| Column 2
! style="width:47%;"| Column 3
|-
| red
| fish
| washing machine
|-
| blue
| bunny
| sofa
|-
| green
| elephant
| fridge
|}

The result:

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
red fish washing machine
blue bunny sofa
green elephant fridge

An Award For You

edit
  The Exceptional Newcomer Award
For your great work on your first article Microelectromechanical system oscillator, I present to you this lovely award. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? nomination of Microelectromechanical system oscillator

edit

I've nominated it for the Did You Know, which, if accepted, will let the article be featured on the main page. You can view the details of the nomination at this page. Thanks for contributing, I hope to see you again. →Στc. 06:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Pnchou. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Microelectromechanical system oscillator.
Message added 01:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Στc. 01:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Pnchou. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added mabdul 08:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I didn't know. Thank you! I'm clicking on the four tildes right now :-)Pnchou (talk) 03:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Application lifecycle management, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

There's an edit notice on my talk page that states conversations about edits to specific articles should be kept at that article. However, you appear to have missed that. You also missed the hidden comment at the top of the list of the ALM software suites, which is what this warning was for. It reads:
Please only add systems that satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements and have a Wikipedia article.
Addition of entries without articles will be reverted without warning.
The fact that I did provide an edit summary also helps understand the issue: First, neither codeBeamer nor Intland Software have an article. Second, Endevor has an article while Endeavor does not so why was it changed? So if you're still a bit confused, go to the article's talk page and continue the discussion there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Walter, I'm sorry, but I'm a novice Wikipedia editor, so I'm sure exactly how to "go to the article's talk page and continue the discussion there". The reason codeBeamer and Intland Softwre don't have an article is because they kept on getting deleted, as I understnad it. Next, Can you pls explain why is Jira specifically worthy? Finally, I don't understand what you're saying about Endevor/Endeavor. If you're referring to you saw an edit when I was inserting codeBeamer by Intland, that was only becaue that was my shortcut editing method to ensure I don't mess up the existing table when inserting codeBeamer.

Walter, I think I understand you're asking me why I changed "Endevor" to "Endeavor"? That was by accident. You see, all I was trying to do was to insert codeBeamer by Intland without messing up the exisiting table. Endevor by CA Techologies was the first table entry. In moved it one row down, I accidentally misspelled "Endevor".

Back to codeBeamer by Intland Software. I have a proposed codeBeamer article that Intland would like to post. Could you pls advise how to get around the "chicken and egg" problem? Does Intland need to first successfully post a codeBeamer article before adding themselve to the table in the Application Lifecycle Mgmt table? Or can both tasks occur at the same time?

Understood. To go an article's talk page, start by going to the article, in this case, application lifecycle management. Depending on your skin, the layout will be different, but look for a "tab" that has "Talk" on it. Click on that. In this instance, it's talk:Application lifecycle management.
While I understand that you think codeBeamer should have an article, it doesn't. Write the article first would apply to this situation. There's no chicken and egg problem here. First, we need the chicken and then, you can link to it. Alternately, you could try to gain support to add products that don't have articles, but that too would have to be done on the article's talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
The Endevor and Endeavor issue was that when you made the edit, you somehow changed the spelling and it broke a link. I don't know how, but it's clear that it happened.
I recognize that you likely didn't intend to break the link, which was the disruptive element, but it did happen. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Walter for your very helpful clarification. I'll work on positng a codeBeamer article first. I apologize for inadvertently breaking the Endevor link while trying to add codeBeamer w/o messing up the existing tabel. Last, now that I understand how to dialogue with you by going to [talk:Application lifecycle management], does this mean I should specifically go to the Tools and Vendors section by clicking on the Edit button and I need to sign off as [User:PNChou|Nancy Chou]] (talk) 11:08pm, 1 October 2017 (PST)?